M/S Rockmed Pharma Pvt. Ltd. vs . M/S Nukind Healthcare & Anr. on 28 March, 2023
M/S Rockmed Pharma Pvt. Ltd. vs . M/S Nukind Healthcare & Anr. on 28
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 254 (0.77 seconds)1 State vs . Ramesh Chand Etc. on 9 February, 2010
effect that they or any of
them with any common intention prefixed numeric '4' in the statement of
account. I am in agreement
A Suit For Permanent Injunction ... vs Gift Pack & on 3 June, 2016
just the generic part
'ZID' that is common to both marks. The further prefix
'OR' too is common. In other words
A Suit For Permanent Injunction ... vs Gift Pack & on 1 August, 2016
just the generic part
'ZID' that is common to both marks. The further prefix
'OR' too is common. In other words
(C.B.I. vs . Rohit Sehgal) on 15 May, 2013
(C.B.I. vs . Rohit Sehgal) on 15 May, 2013
Judgement in the matter of
Abbott Helthcare Private Limited vs Sgs Pharmaceutical Pvt Ltd on 3 June, 2025
after the
plaintiff's mark "ESGIPYRIN" with the prefix
word "ESGI" as well as suffix word "PYRIN ... objection against the plaintiff.
24.7 The word "PYRIN" is a common word, which is
used in pharmaceutical field, so usage or
registration
Morepen Laboratories Limited vs Nippon Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd on 14 March, 2026
summons, Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 entered
appearance and filed their common written statement, raising
certain preliminary objections and contesting the claim of
plaintiff ... untenable. It is pleaded that the prefixes "RYTH" and
"RITH" are common to the pharmaceutical trade and are
used by various
A Suit For Permanent Injunction ... vs P. Sulochana Bai (2015) 7 Scale 136 on 23 August, 2018
just the generic part
'ZID' that is common to both marks. The further prefix
'OR' too is common. In other words
Brief Facts Of The Case As Necessary For ... vs M/S Bombay Waterproof Manufacturing ... on 21 August, 2018
coined and adopted a
"SHALI" prefix trademark and similarly adopted numerous
other marks bearing the prefix "SHALI". On the other hand ... SHALIMAR" & "SHALI" prefix trademark. It was
lastly argued that the name is common to the trade and that
the plaintiff
Jagmohan Kumar Trading vs Ram Gopal Shri Niwas on 30 March, 2024
would include all visual aspects of
the mark, like any common syllables, designs, suffixes, prefixes,
shapes, length, etc.
With respect to the Logo