outgress of the plaintiff and his family members in the
common space / parking slot in the suit property and further restrain the
defendants from creating ... commonly by all
the occupants for ingress- egress and for parking purposes and nobody
has any specific right to obstruct upon the said common space
authority, the areas of residential unit as well as of the common spaces and common buildings are specified and super area cannot change until there ... provide a comparison of the areas of the original approved common spaces and the flats with finally approved common spaces/buildings and the flats
always less than super built-up area which includes the open common space around the building, but the built-up or covered area ... unlike the built-up area or carpet area, includes the open common space around the building concerned and hence, the Respondent No. 1/Complainant
sanctioned plans is effected and also envisage that the
percentage of undivided common interest of the owners of the flats cannot be
changed without their ... height of
blocks. For building height up to 18 mts., the spacing shall be
increased by 1 metre for every addition of 3 mtrs
action to remove the cafeterias/shops etc.
occupying the public utility common spaces inside the shopping malls
throughout Tamilnadu and to take severe penal action ... shopping malls throughout Tamilnadu which rented/let out the public
utility common spaces for commercial purpose and illegally gaining
from the same and cancel their
authority, the
areas of residential unit as well as of the common spaces
and common buildings are specified and super area
cannot change until there ... should provide a comparison of the areas of the
original approved common spaces and the flats with
finally approved common spaces/buildings and the
flats
areas of residential unit as well as of the common
spaces and common buildings are specified and super
area cannot change until there is change ... should provide a comparison of the
areas of the original approved common spaces and the
flats with finally approved common spaces/buildings
and the flats
Shapoorji Pallonji And Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Rattan India Power Ltd & Anr. on 7
field occupied
leaves no space for any subsequent legislation to cover the same field. The
jostling for space pre-supposes a conflict between ... other. The concept is thus one
of encroachment of a common space by a later entrant resulting in an
eclipse of the field already covered
society. Therefore, claim made by the
builder in respect of common spaces and TDR was false. The builder
has rights in respect of unsold premises
