physical features located in the western side wall of the suit first
schedule property, namely, four windows each on the ground floor, and
Page ... through the window on the western wall of
the first schedule property, the second schedule property is only a
common lane. From the evidence
schedule wall-western wall is a common wall to both the appellant
and the respondent and there was no open on the wall. Subsequently ... wall is only shown as
exclusive wall of the respondent/plaintiff. The wall in south to this alone was
treated as common wall
taken up
and heard together and disposed of by way of this common
Judgment.
3(i) The case of the first respondent/cross objector/plaintiff ... immediate north of the suit lane.
There are three windows in the southern wall of the said house.
Through the said windows, the first respondent
opened the
window and informed his wife. At the time, the revision petitioner
jumped from the compound wall of the defacto complainant and
ran away ... opened the window and saw the vehicle burning
on fire. He immediately call his wife and both of them looked
through the window. The revision
items are inflated. According to
the defendants, the plaintiffs wrongly included the common pathway and open
space within their schedule.
3.2. The defendants further claimed ... that earlier, the house remained locked. They
maintained that their northern wall has windows and doors facing their own
property and not the plaintiffs’ land
Pandian @ Gopal Pandian vs State Rep.By on 19 January, 2023
Author: P.Velmurugan
Bench
Pandian @ Gopal Pandian vs State Rep.By on 19 January, 2023
Author: P.Velmurugan
Bench
