fair competition in India, by prohibiting trade practices which
cause appreciable adverse effect on competitions, besides curbing negative
aspects of competition. The Act provides ... initiating investigation. The Act has also repealed the
Monopolistic and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.
Section 3(1) of the Act prohibits agreements in respect
information, and as an illustration, reference to Section 19 of the
Competition Act, 2002 was made. The learned Senior Counsel also referred
to Section ... WIPL had also referred to Section
19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended
by the Competition Amendment Act
there any special police officer who could act under Section 14 of the Act.
3. Prize competitions though promoted and conducted by the applicants from ... territory and hence punishable under the Act, If other acts, but not the promotion of prize competition, were illegal and punishable under the Act
case, the aforesaid judgment is
distinguishable. Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, was
enforced vide gazette notification of the Government of India
(Downloaded ... Competition Commission of
India , (2016) 135 SCL 326 (Delhi), which was upheld by
the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Competition
Commission
case, the aforesaid judgment is
distinguishable. Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, was
enforced vide gazette notification of the Government of India
(Downloaded ... Competition Commission of
India , (2016) 135 SCL 326 (Delhi), which was upheld by
the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Competition
Commission
case, the aforesaid judgment is
distinguishable. Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, was
enforced vide gazette notification of the Government of India
(Downloaded ... Competition Commission of
India , (2016) 135 SCL 326 (Delhi), which was upheld by
the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Competition
Commission
case, the aforesaid judgment is
distinguishable. Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, was
enforced vide gazette notification of the Government of India
(Downloaded ... Competition Commission of
India , (2016) 135 SCL 326 (Delhi), which was upheld by
the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Competition
Commission
Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray vs Justice B. Lentin And Others on 12 September, 1988
Equivalent
Vinod Dua vs Union Of India on 3 June, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 SUPREME
Limitation Act of 1963, the objection raised by the petitioner must fail. We have not gone into the provisions of the Limitation Act , particularly Section ... Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala , , whether the Bombay Prize Competition Act, which regulated prize competitions of a gambling nature infringed Article
