December 8, 2009 were challenged by SAIL before the Competition
Appellate Tribunal. Thereupon, Competition Commission filed an
application on January 28, 2010 before ... Competition Appellate
Tribunal seeking impleadment in the appeal filed by SAIL. The
Competition Appellate Tribunal rejected the application filed by the
Competition Commission. Against that
Rajkumar Nagpal 2022 SCC Online
1119
(v) Kingfisher Airlines Limited vs. Competition
Commission of India 2010 SCC Online Bom
2186."
38. Shri Dattar, learned ... Rahkumar Nagpal , 2022 SCC Online
1119
(ix) Kingfisher Airlines Limited v. Competition
Commission, 2010 SCC Online Bom 2186 (para
10 and 12). "
45. Shri
above, reliance was also placed on the decision of the Competition
Commission of India dated 28/5/2012 wherein it was specifically held
that subscribing ... proper.
8
(d) On 28/5/2012, the Competition Commission of India passed
an order wherein it is specifically held that by subscribing
reduced.
26. In this regard, in Excel Corp Care Limited vs
Competition Commission of India & Anr , (2017) 8 SCC 47,
the Supreme Court held ... objective
contained in the Act, viz., to discourage and stop
anti-competitive practices has to be achieved and
those who are perpetrators of such practices
decision of the Supreme
Court in Excel Corp Care Ltd. vs. Competition
Commission of India Ltd. 2017 (8) SCC 47 and the
decision ... High Court in Rajkumar Dyeing
and Printing Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. Competition
28
Commission of India 2014 SCC OnLine Delhi 6450
on the issue
harsh and excessive.
11
12. In Excel Corp Care Limited vs Competition Commission
of India & Anr , (2017) 8 SCC 47, the Supreme Court held ... objective contained in the Act,
viz., to discourage and stop anti-competitive practices has
to be achieved and those who are perpetrators of such
practices
merger being a combination under Section
5(c)(i)(A) of the Competition Act9, was approved by the CCI10
vide notification dated January ... Praxair India Pvt. Ltd.
9
Competition Act, 2002
10
Competition Commission of India
4
2.3 In 2019, the group decided to form LSASPL11, a joint
well
as discriminatory.
21. In Excel Corp Care Limited vs Competition
Commission of India & Anr , (2017) 8 SCC 47, the Supreme
Court held ... objective contained in the Act,
viz., to discourage and stop anti-competitive practices
has to be achieved and those who are perpetrators of
such practices
proportionality, we find that in Excel Corp Care Limited vs.
Competition Commission of India & Anr. [(2017) 8 SCC 47], the
Supreme Court held ... objective contained
in the Act, viz., to discourage and stop anti-competitive
practices has to be achieved and those who are
perpetrators of such practices
quantum of penalty.
14. In Excel Corp Care Limited vs Competition
Commission of India & Anr , (2017) 8 SCC 47, the Supreme
Court held ... objective contained in the Act,
viz., to discourage and stop anti-competitive practices
has to be achieved and those who are perpetrators of
such practices
