Regulation 35 and the proviso to Regulation 37(1) of the
Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009 as well as
Regulation ... power conferred by Section 64 of the Competition
Act, 2002, the CCI made the Competition Commission of India (General)
Regulations, 2009 (for short
Rajkumar Dyeing & Printing Works ... vs Competition Commission Of India & Anr. on 19 November, 2014
Author: Vibhu Bakhru
Bench: Vibhu Bakhru
THE HIGH COURT ... RAJKUMAR DYEING & PRINTING WORKS
PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Petitioners
versus
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
& ANR. .... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case
South Asia Lpg Company Private Limited vs Competition Commission Of India And Ors on 2 September, 2013
Author: V.K. Jain
Bench: V.K. Jain ... Amitabh Kumar, Ms.Divya
Chaturvedi and Ms.Awantika Manohar,
Advocates.
versus
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS
... Respondents
Through:Mr.Rajeev Saxena with Ms.Toshika
competition was
recognised by The Competition Bill, 2001, whose notable objects are as
under :-
a) The Competition Bill, 2001 seeks to ensure fair
competition ... finding of an existence of
abuse of dominance or anti-competitive agreement, the
Competition Commission of India can :
(d) direct SAIL to discontinue
been initiated. The respondent-BCCL has filed a case before the
Competition Commission of India being Case No.09 of 2019 under the
Competition ... hand, the respondent-BCCL initiated proceeding before the
Competition Commission of India under the Act, 2002 against all the
participating bidders on the allegation
Industries vs Competition Commission Of India & Anr. on 19 November, 2014
Author: Vibhu Bakhru
Bench: Vibhu Bakhru
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... RAJKUMAR DYEING & PRINTING WORKS
PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Petitioners
versus
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
& ANR. .... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case
under Section 19 (1) (b) of the Competition Act, 20023 before the Secretary, Competition Commission of India4 alleging that the petitioner flouted the provisions ... which was not considered and the Railway straightway went before the Competition Commission of India as provided under the Competition Act, 2002 . The said
decision of the Apex Court in the case of Competition Commission of
India v. Steel Authority of India Limited Another ... made to a decision of the Apex Court in the
Competition Commission of India (supra). In Paragraphs 50 and 51 of
the said decision
lists prepared by the Commission under rule
19 of the Rules. Meanwhile, the Public Service Commission
held another competitive examination-the 1972 examination-
for appointments ... list prepared by the
Commission under Rule 19 of the Rules. Meanwhile, the Public
Service Commission held another competitive examination for
appointment
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY DHR AND DIRECTOR GENERAL.
3. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
9TH FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1,
KIDWAI NAGAR (EAST)
NEW DELHI ... same proposition.
10. The learned senior counsel representing the 3rd
respondent/Competition Commission of India would submit that the
3rd respondent is unnecessarily dragged into
