Sugar ... vs 2.2.1 National Federation Of ... on 30 November, 2011
BEFORE THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Suo--Motu
Case ... Background
The case under consideration relates to the allegations of certain anti--competitive
practices of sugar mills in India.
1.1 Before the proceedings
received `50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) from
Ranbaxy as non-competition fee. The said amount was
paid by Ranbaxy under an agreement dated ... agreement contained prohibitive/restrictive covenant in
consideration of which a non-competition fee of `50 lakhs
was received by the assessee from Ranbaxy. The
agreement
with regard to entrustment of
operational facilities at the port to provide
competition and to prevent monopolies, the
provisions of Clause 8.31 would have ... that private facilities
were available to all users on equal and
7
competitive terms.
5. The appellant is a Company incorporated under
the laws
addition, 40% marks in Physics,
Chemistry and Biology taken together in the competitive
examination for admission to the MBBS course. The State
Government of Gujarat ... have come in the merit list prepared as a result
of the competitive entrance examination by securing not less
than 40% marks in Physics, Chemistry
area of Greater Noida in
Western Uttar Pradesh.
(b) To promote competitive procurement of electricity by
distribution licensee and to facilitate transparency, fairness
and level ... Request for Proposal (RFP) for
procurement of 500 MW power through competitive
bidding process under the said Section 63 read with
Guidelines issued
adjudication in
India. Essentially, these claims are based on the U.K.
Competition Act and the curial advantage that the Plaintiff may
have by prosecuting ... matches for the
Indian cricket team and a number of domestic
cricket competitions in India, for which it exploits
the broadcasting rights.
6. In particular
Stock Exchange Of India Ltd. & ... on 23 June, 2011
BEFORE THE
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
CASE NO. 13/2009
Information filed ... order dated 25.05.2011
Date of order under section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002:
23.6.2011
Informant: MCX Stock Exchange Ltd.
Through: Shri A.N. Haksar
Rules as it totally demolishes the concept of
competitive environment which is impermissible in the face of the said Rule.
It is urged that ... choice of world
class operators for airlines at affordable prices in a competitive environment
were also kept in view. It is put forth that Delhi
funds are to be utilized by the borrower;
(j) that in a competitive market which is volatile with interest
rates varying from time to time ... well as during the arguments has referred to a
judgment of the Competition Commission in Neeraj Malhotra v. Deustche
Post Bank Home Finance Ltd. upholding
Society vs Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. ... on 23 May, 2011
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. UTPE-99/2009 & RTPE-16/2009 ... ORDER UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE COMPETITION ACT
Date of Order: 23rd May, 2011
RTPE-16/2009
INFORMANT :- Cine Prakashakula Viniyoga Darula Sangham, a registered
