dated 4.3.96 which is in English. The trade mark No.700543 is in Bengali and trade mark No.700544 is in Hindi. Under annexure ... already registered mark then the same cannot be registered. Merely because the respondent's mark has been registered as a composite mark it cannot
trade marks were 'BALBI' word per se. Since the respondent did not accomplish much in selling its products under the trade mark 'BALBI ... admissible in law. He submitted that in matter of composite trade marks the suffix and rest of the part of its has to be taken
Chairman)
1. An application was filed for registration of a composite label trade mark in the names of Satyanarayan Agarwal and Prayagdas Agarwal said ... Jagmohan Mullick Lane, Kolkata for registration of a composite label trade mark and on being advertised was opposed by Prabhu Shankar Agarwal, Mahesh Kumar Agarwal
trade mark 'Bata' under No. 132294 as of 20.1.1948.
(ii) Appellants are also registered proprietors of trade mark 'BSC' in different ... adopted the impugned mark in the year 1975 which is a composite trade mark in respect of sewing machine parts and that the impugned mark
mark DROTIN and the respondent's mark is nearly identical to the mark of the applicant.
11. Learned Counsel submitted that the trade mark ... removal of respondent's trade mark from the register.
12. Learned Counsel made a submission that the trade mark DROT is in continuous
well as 'SUPER STAR'. Moreover, the words Trade Marks are composite one and cannot be separated. Hence, there is no merit in these ... entire agreement with the view taken by the Registrar of Trade Marks. Accordingly, we do not find any merit in either of the appeals. Consequently
started using the said trade mark 'DOLAR' in respect of cough syrup in the year 1981. The trade mark 'DOLAR ... trade mark 'DOLAR' under No. 439950 in class 5 in respect of medicinal preparations. The said trade mark is valid, subsisting
that the Trade Mark of the respondents PMP is totally distinguishable from the Trade Mark of the applicant PRT. Both the Trade Marks cannot ... house mark of the respondents' firm. When both the Trade Marks are being used as the house mark, one Trade Mark alone cannot
registered trade mark. The respondent has submitted that its registered trade mark is neither phonetically nor visually similar to the trade mark of the petitioner ... petitioner's mark FEFOL. The respondent submitted that the trade mark ZIFOL-12 was registered after publication in the Trade Mark Journal as admitted
more than three decades the mark has acquired distinctiveness, whereas the respondents have been using the trade mark 'ZODIAC' since 29.4.1983 and have ... trade mark is 'ZODIAC' a composite mark comprising a monogram ZS, device of a concentric circle with a flag and the mark written
