this order I shall decide a composite application of defendant no.1 which has
been filed under Order 9 Rule 7 and 13 read with ... Application of plaintiff under Section 151 CPC:
31. This application has been filed by defendant no.1 on 18.11.2011. Arguments on
the composite application
termination of tenancy, another notice
was issued on 18th February, 2002. Composite application was filed
by the appellant under Sections ... submitted that:
(1) As a composite application for eviction as also the
damages has been filed and a composite notice having
been issued, the onus
have acted arbitrarily or
unfairly.
37. Appellant indisputably filed a composite application for development
of a slum area, that is, both for plot ... thousand square feet, the
application filed by the appellant was a composite application both for plot
Nos. 559 and 569 (part). Appellant herself contended that
However, Section 166 of the said Act
contemplates filing of a composite
application, as is evident from the proviso
appended to sub-section ... come forward under section 140 of the Act
independently not as composite application, they are not only
debarred from coming forward under Section 163A
assessment year 1961-62 the assessee submitted a composition application to the concerned Income-tax Officer in which he sought to exclude the property that ... November 1959. At the same time his wife filed another composition application in regard to the property that was given to her under the settlement
reference to separate application means that it is not supplementary to the earlier application. It is a separate and distinct application seeking exemption only ... Therefore it is clear that the application dated 6.12.2000 is a fresh application independent of the composite application submitted earlier.
27. The separate application referred
must be deemed not to have been pressed; and (c)
a composite application, under Section 111 and 397 of the Act, cannot be filed
before ... respondents in this regard does not, therefore, merit
acceptance.
(ii) COMPOSITE APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 111 AND 397 OF THE ACT:
21. It is contended
petitioner on November 20, 1978. Thereafter, the petitioners filed one composite application on March 2, 1979, under Section ... months expired on November 27, 1978, and the first composite application under Section 27(3) was filed on March 2, 1979, long beyond the instructed
inasmuch as all the petitioners could not combine to file one composite application as the act of rejection of the nomination of each petitioner ... separate cause of action to the petitioner concerned and one composite application could not be filed on behalf of all of them, and (b) that
entertain or accept such Petition beyond 120
days. The composite application under Section 34 and/or separate
application for explaining the delay or Notice ... application. The learned Judge, if satisfied with the
reason for filing application beyond 3 months, but before 30 days,
such application is required
