referred
to as 'Trial Court'), rejecting petitioner's composite application
under Order VII Rule 11 and Section 151 of the Code ... contentions raised in the application. The Trial Court
has outrightly rejected the application, treating it to be an
application under Order VII Rule
thereof within one year and in such a case, if a
composite application is filed by the claimant for recovery of
accruing maintenance ... 2020]
would be absolutely justified for the Court to entertain a
composite application and to award separate sentences of one
month for each default
court came to the conclusion that it was not indicated in the
application as to which paragraphs were sought to be amended,
which sale deeds ... noticed that the petitioners had filed a
composite application under Order VI Rule 17 and
Order I Rule 10 of the Code, without separately
mentioning
court came to the conclusion that it was not indicated in the
application as to which paragraphs were sought to be amended,
which sale deeds ... noticed that the petitioners had filed a
composite application under Order VI Rule 17 and
Order I Rule 10 of the Code, without separately
mentioning
case in hand, I am of the considered
view that the subject application seeking amendment in the
plaint and impleadment of the beneficiaries ... order impugned
dt. 24.07.2004 is quashed and set aside and the composite
application filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17, Order
1 Rule
registered.
According to learned counsel as the petitioners' composite
application has been rejected whole hog; their objection in relation
to requirement of registration will ... considered opinion of this Court, though the petitioners'
application was composite application, the learned trial court has
adjudicated upon only first two prayers
dated 25.8.2010, learned Single Judge
(Sr.Div.), Nathdwara has rejected a composite application
submitted by the petitioner as per Order 6 Rule 16 and Order
amendment application has been rejected, contended that the
Trial Court has erred in rejecting petitioner's amendment
application, as it is settled position ... noticed that the petitioners had filed a
composite application under Order VI Rule 17 and Order I Rule 10
of the Code, without separately mentioning
2019
The petitioner has moved the present composite application
seeking correction in the order dated 20.11.2019 and for
amendment in cause title, so also
Agarwal, contends that the
subject application dated 30.05.2016 was a composite application,
seeking amendment in the plaint as well as seeking impleadment
of the persons ... leaves no room for ambiguity that
the same was a composite application under Order VI Rule 17 and
Order I Rule 10 of the Code
