weight. The '655 application provides a
foliar application of Sulphur for pest control, whereas the subject
patent provides sulphur composition for soil application ... fertilizer composition, a nutrient composition,
a plant strengthener composition, a plant protectant composition,
a soil conditioner composition and a yield enhancer composition.
According
Sections 30 and 33 of the Act as well, is a composite application and should be also treated as his objections. This, admittedly ... application dated 13th January, 1967 cannot be treated as a composite application. Further, the fact that the appellant filed objections under Sections
Commissioner, Sales Tax had to examine and decide on the application for
composition by the assessee. Drawing parallel with the provision contained
in Section ... Commissioner is satisfied that in the facts and circumstances, the application
for composition deserves to be considered further, it having passed the
muster
certain preliminary objections with regard to the maintainability of a composite application under Sections 538 , 539 , 542 and 543 of the Companies Act (for short ... first preliminary objection relates to the maintainability of a composite application under Sections 538 , 539 , 542 and 543 of the Act on the ground that
return of the plaint. I.A. No. 10244/2011
was a composite application by the respondent/defendant under Order 7 Rule
10 and Order
appear to the
summons and to defend the suit in the same application. It is,
therefore, not enough for the defendant to show special
circumstances ... position to disclose
the defence and make a composite application. The applicants relied on Manjari v.
Ranjit Singh 2007(146) PLR 15 (DB), a judgment
Damayanti Verma (Deceased) Through Her ... vs Lic And Anr. on 25 July, 2011
Author: Kailash
Monghibai v. Cooverji Umersey .
21 In my opinion, the absence of an application under Order 22, Rule 3 in due time after the death ... application was made. If necessary, the application for leave to continue the suit may be treated as being in substance a composite application for substitution
this issue for the reason in the present case though a composite application
under the DRC Act on more than one grounds was filed however ... trial. In the
present case on the Respondent filing a composite application since the
learned ARC vide order dated 31st January, 2014 held that
However, from the prior
art documents cited herein, the formulation/ composition of the
impugned application is already known. Moreover, the
applicant has not provided ... that from the prior art documents
cited therein, the formulation/composition of the impugned application was
already known. Moreover, the applicant had not provided