extracted
hereunder:-
Plaintiff's Marks Defendants' Mark
34. It is evident that the rival marks are composite marks and their
registration will ... nature of the marks i.e. whether the marks are word marks
or label marks or composite marks i.e. both words and label works
Courts while dealing with
the case of trademark infringement, involving composite marks must
consider the same in their entirety as an indivisible whole rather than ... particular portion or element of a mark in case of
composite marks and that the principle of 'anti-dissection' does not
Signature
arbitrary mark for whisky. Therefore, the respondent has vast
reputation and goodwill in the said mark. The appellant is using a
composite word mark ... Officer's Choice dates back to 1988 and for the composite
mark to 1990 in Class 33. By virtue of the registrations, Plaintiff
that the Defendants have a
valid and subsisting registration in the composite mark
in Class 5, for which they had applied on
18.12.2018 and secured ... Plaintiffs' mark is registered. The
answer, in my opinion, is an emphatic 'no'. Defendants' registered mark is a
composite mark consisting
mandated that Courts while dealing
with cases of trademark infringement involving composite marks, must
consider them in their entirety rather than truncating or dissecting them ... trade
mark. Even the learned single judge agrees to this proposition
when the learned judge quotes McCarthy on Trade Marks that
all composite marks
Venus Worldwide Entertainment Private ... vs Popular Entertainment Network (Pen) ... on 17 August, 2023
Author: Jyoti
phonetic
similarity between the applied and the cited marks overlooking that the
applied mark is a composite, coined and distinctive mark comprising the
terms SIGNATURE ... refused to register the mark on the ground that the mark was visually and
phonetically similar to many cited marks and there was identity/similarity
trademark 'CROMPTON PEBBLE'. In law, registration of a composite/
label mark confers exclusive right to its use as a whole ... mark "MADHUR 100"
appears as a part of a composite mark "MANGALDEEP
Madhur 100" and not as merely a term descriptive
Somany Ceramics Limited vs Shri Ganesh Electric Co. & Ors. on 28 July, 2022
Author
Citizen Watch Co. Ltd. vs Dinesh Kumar Laxman Bhai Virda on 16 May, 2024
Author