Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 349 (0.79 seconds)

Ramfry Sagar & Consultants Pvt Ltd vs Panchkula on 9 October, 2024

From these apparent and admitted facts we observe that the name & composition of impugned legal business kept changing. However, based on these facts only ... different from the Intellectual Property( Trade Mark). 27. The above quoted admitted facts also reveal that „Name‟ and „composition‟ of the impugned business / legal profession
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gokul Exim Pvt Ltd. vs Nhava Sheva on 22 February, 2022

goods shall be marked with the details such as manufacturers name, specification, heat numbers, dimensions, finish, chemical composition etc. Accordingly, it has been the practice ... Test Certificate containing the details viz. Heat Number, finish, quality, dimensions, chemical composition etc. However, it has been noticed that some of the Importers/CHAs
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ahmedabad vs Chandan Exports on 5 April, 2023

were found to be both side coated aluminum Composite Plate of 3mm and 4 mm thickness marked on some sheet as „Timex Strong‟ and some ... 10893/2019-DB Customs Marine & Preventive Wing, Mumbai revealed that trade mark „Timex Brand‟ affixed on the goods belongs
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nu Calcutta Construction Co vs Commissioner Of Service Tax Kol on 10 October, 2023

Cenvat Credit was taken. They have also submitted the statement showing composite contract where they did not avail the Cenvat Credit. The Learned Counsel also ... contracts are together marked with letter-Annexure „A‟. 2. Statement showing "contract wise- service wise" payment received against „composit contracts‟ where they availed
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next