Sant Nirankari Mandal(Regd) vs Nirankari Dham And Ors on 19 September, 2025
Sant Nirankari Mandal(Regd) vs Nirankari Dham And Ors on 19 September, 2025
IN THE
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2520 (5.35 seconds)A Suit For Permanent Injunction ... vs Gift Pack & on 1 August, 2016
Similarities
[1] The Anti-Dissection Rule
[a] Compare composites as a Whole Conflicting
composite marks are to be compared by looking at
them ... anti-dissection rule to view
the component parts of conflicting composite marks as
preliminary step on the way to an ultimate
determination of probable customer
A Suit For Permanent Injunction ... vs Gift Pack & on 3 June, 2016
Similarities
[1] The Anti-Dissection Rule
[a] Compare composites as a Whole Conflicting
composite marks are to be compared by looking at
them ... anti-dissection rule to view
the component parts of conflicting composite marks as
preliminary step on the way to an ultimate
determination of probable customer
Vikas Gulati vs M/S Focus Optics on 25 May, 2010
applied for registration and
the Trade Mark Registry had registered the trade mark with
the condition that Trade Mark shall give no right ... plaintiff
has no right in trade mark FOCUS and mark of the plaintiff
which is registered is a composite mark consisting of
device of optical
Mr. S. P. Garg vs M/S Sumangal Calendar Company on 18 May, 2010
said mark, the
Registrar of Trade Marks refused them the registration and
the only mark registered in favour of the defendants was a
composite mark ... registration of the said mark but the Registrar of Trade Marks
refused the registration and the only mark registered in
favour of the defendants
Marion Biotech Pvt Ltd vs Brawn Laboratories Limited on 27 September, 2023
plaintiff and defendant trade mark are not similar as
plaintiff trade mark is "CINEPAR" and defendant trade Mark is "DI
CLOPAR ... nature of the marks i.e. whether the marks are word
marks or label marks or composite marks i.e. both words
and label works
M/S Bright Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. vs . Narang Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. on 13 December, 2022
mark' as defined under the Trade Mark Act . Any adoption or
use of the trade mark ESPACE or of any deceptively similar
mark ... composite
marks bearing the mark ESPACE, which is an essential
feature of all the trade marks. Infringing Mark is phonetically,
visually, structurally, and otherwise identical
A Suit For Permanent Injunction ... vs P. Sulochana Bai (2015) 7 Scale 136 on 23 August, 2018
Similarities
[1] The Anti-Dissection Rule
[a] Compare composites as a Whole Conflicting
composite marks are to be compared by looking at
them ... Page No. 14/29
the component parts of conflicting composite marks as
preliminary step on the way to an ultimate
determination of probable customer reaction
Puma Se vs Laxmi Traders on 6 September, 2023
mark POMO
along with Plaintiff's leaping cat device i.e., an identical/
deceptively similar logo and mark to Plaintiff's mark PUMA ... Laxmi Traders Page 7 of 22
Word Mark: Word Mark:
PUMA POMO
Composite Mark: Composite Mark:
The composite mark The composite mark
consists of word
Lumax Industries Ltd. vs . M/S. Lumax Lights on 1 April, 2015
composite marks of the
plaintiffs containing the mark LUMAX, duly registered with the Trade
Mark Registration No. 259394 and 426009.
(b)The plaintiff suit ... composite marks of the
plaintiffs containing the mark LUMAX, duly registered with the Trade
Mark Registration No. 259394 and 426009.
(b)The plaintiff suit