difference between (a) A composite tenancy or a tenancy for a mixed purpose, and (b) An integrated contract of tenancy for dual purposes. In Nilesh ... tenancy premises into compartments. But, in case of tenancy of type (b), which is a single tenancy for dual purposes, the contract of tenancy
ejectment applications respondent took the
plea that the tenancy for three portions is one and
composite and the landlord has no right to split ... three premises i.e.shop, house and godown
was one composite tenancy and therefore it will not make any difference if
the Appellate Authority
Section 41 is
applicable, as the Plaintiffs have claimed composite tenancy in respect
of the office premises and the parking space, Sub-Section
floor. Had the tenant taken the contention
that it is a composite tenancy under one transaction and
common rent was payable, it could have been ... tenancy cannot be split to order eviction from the portion.
But since the tenant himself has assertively contended that
tenancy is not either composite tenancy
considered
opinion that the entire suit premises is single and composite tenancy in
favour of Sh.Amrik Singh i.e.late father of defendant ... tenancy was oral between the parties and as per
my findings on issue no.3, the tenancy of the defendant is single and
composite
Jain and Sh. Dalpat Singh
Jain and there is only one composite tenancy and, therefore, the
tenancy can not be sub-divided as claimed ... next ground taken is that the tenancy was one and
composite tenancy and now it can not be sub-divided by the legal
lease deed, there can be no two
opinions that the tenancy was joint/composite and not an
individual one. Therefore, on these admitted facts ... rent is
more than Rs.3500 and the tenancy is a joint and composite
one. As such, on these admitted, facts, there
Sood. It was thus sought to be projected that the tenancy being separate, a
composite petition was not maintainable.
Civil Revision No.8131 ... Rent Controller.
The contention of the petitioner that tenancy was separate and
therefore, a composite petition could not have been filed, is not acceptable. There
challenge the execution of Will by Late Smt.
Satyawati and tenancy was not for composite purpose nor any
commercial activities were carried out from ... substance.
C. The next ground taken is that the tenancy was for
composite purpose as well as commercial purpose, but the said
objection has become
raised by the tenant that it should be construed as a fresh tenancy from the date the third partner has taken over as owner ... material for deciding the question from where the tenancy commenced, the change in the composition of the firm and eventually, allocation of the shop
