residential purpose which the respondents
converted into the composite tenancy for residential as well
as for non residential purpose. Defence of the present
24
appellant
months to plaintiffs No. 2 & 3 as joint and composite tenancy. The
defendant No. 1 received rent of the premises only for one month
single word is whispered about
ground floor and the existence of composite tenancy. Under
these circumstances the defendant cannot adduce oral evidence
to vary ... first floor and the existence
17 SC 167/14
of composite tenancy. Plaint is dead silent in respect of first
floor.
23. In cross-examination
lease deed,
there can be no two opinions that the tenancy
was joint/composite and not an individual
one. Therefore, on these admitted facts ... rent is more than Rs.3500 and the tenancy is
a joint and composite one. As such, on these
admitted facts, there
relationship of landlordtenant between the parties besides
composite nature of tenancy for residentialcumcommercial purpose
and as such eviction petition is not maintainable ... averments disputing her title and ownership of property besides
composite nature of tenancy for residentialcumcommercial purpose.
4. Respondent thereafter filed his rejoinder
house tax. It was pleaded that the tenancy was a month to month tenancy commencing from the first day of the month and terminating ... pleaded that by a composite notice dated 29.11.2012 of demand as well as termination of tenancy, under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, which
authority for the proposition that a composite notice
terminating tenancy for three consecutive defaults in payment of
rents is permissible under Section ... said
decision it is also held that a composite intimation and notice of
termination of tenancy is valid. The decision is not an authority
authority for the proposition that a composite notice
terminating tenancy for three consecutive defaults in payment of
rents is permissible under Section ... said
decision it is also held that a composite intimation and notice of
termination of tenancy is valid. The decision is not an authority
authority for the proposition that a composite notice
terminating tenancy for three consecutive defaults in payment of
rents is permissible under Section ... said
decision it is also held that a composite intimation and notice of
termination of tenancy is valid. The decision is not an authority
respect of Schedule-II property. As per Ex.P3 tenancy was for
12 months making it compulsorily registerable ... schedule
premises plaintiff has caused the said composite notice
expressing her intention unequivocally in terminating the
tenancy of both premises. The only interesting point
