Shri Ramdhiraj Laxman Dhobi & Anr vs Shri Ramdas Behari Dhobi on 25 April, 2018
Nilesh Nandkumar Shah (supra), the
Supreme Court has held that a composite tenancy or a
tenancy granted for the mixed purpose of residential and
commercial
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 165 (0.91 seconds)Kamlesh Bhardwaj vs Sh. Ram Kumar (Deceased) on 26 September, 2018
expressly or impliedly consents to such splitting. It will
remain one composite tenancy so far as the tenants rights are
concerned
Satya Prakash & Ors vs Distt Judge Sultanpur & Ors on 19 January, 2018
that the premises in question were let out is not in dispute. Tenancy in respect of premises is also not in dispute. The fact that ... dispute that the structure over the land which was compositely the building or the tenancy premises, fell down, possibly on account of decay or dilapidation
Hena Halder vs Soumitra Parui And Others on 15 November, 2018
whether the suit could
be maintainable in its composite form for eviction in
respect of a tenancy as well as in respect of a licensed
Ito 3(1)(2), Mumbai vs Brindaban Builders P. Ltd., Mumbai on 28 February, 2018
premises have been allowed by the assessee not as a tenancy simpliciter but
for composite services, which included use of premises. Be that
Ito 3(1)(2), Mumbai vs Brindaban Builders P.Ltd, Mumbai on 2 November, 2018
premises
have been allowed by the assessee not as a tenancy simpliciter but for composite
services, which included use of premises. Be that
Sh. Nand Gopal Jethi vs Shri Lal Fabiani on 26 September, 2018
composite purposes i.e. both for commercial as well as
residential purposes from the day of inception of the tenancy
and the same has been ... residential-cum-commercial purpose
since beginning of tenancy and they are using it for composite
purpose. As such, claim of the respondent is that oral
Smt. Raj Bala vs Shri Jagdish Prasad on 23 July, 2018
tenant in support of his contention that tenancy was for
composite purposes) had been rejected because the certificate had lost its
validity much prior ... observed there was no
dispute between the parties as regards nature of tenancy and it was
observed that the denials in the written statement were
Sh. Ram Chander Arya vs Sh. Dalbir on 13 April, 2018
lease deed, there can be no two opinions
that the tenancy was joint /composite and not
individual one. Therefore, on these admitted facts
the view
Smt. Priya Garg vs Sh. Jagjit Singh Ameja on 10 September, 2018
lease deed, there can be no two
opinions that the tenancy was joint /composite and
not individual one. Therefore, on these admitted
facts the view