Writ petition in WP.No.31033/2010
before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka. The
plaintiff had filed the writ petition challenging ... parties
before the WP.No.31033/2010. The parties to the Writ
petition entered into compromise during the pendency
of the writ petition
Management being Writ Petition No. 12299 of 1982 and Writ Petition No. 20233 of 1987. The aforesaid two writ petitions were dismissed on 30th September ... writ petition. During the course of the pendency of the writ petition, the application for disposing of the writ petition accompanied by the terms
parties compromise after
the decree in a case has been passed, the effect
of the compromise on the executability of the
:: 12 ::
WP ... compromise and made a decree in terms of it, and
establish that there was no compromise. In that
event, the court which recorded the compromise
writ petition (Annexure Nos. 11 and 12 to the writ petition); and
IV. issue any other writ, order or direction which this ... Bench judgment of this Court passed in bunch of writ petitions leading one being Writ Petition No. 47418 of 2011 ( Dhani Ram and others
2017 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2017 00:46:56 :::
905.wp.6733.17.doc
his costs, charges and expenses.
7 These Consent Terms were ... Consent Terms, the suit stood compromised and
disposed of and compromise decree can be drawn up in view of the
Consent Terms. Pursuant to this
case shows that the writ petition being W.P. (C) No.
2567/1996 was withdrawn because of the compromise i.e the petitioner ... withdrawing W.P. (C) No.
2567/1996, and which is that the writ petition was withdrawn „in view
of the compromise‟ i.e giving finality
said writ petition, parties
to the suit who were also parties in the said writ petition,
entered into a compromise and a compromise petition under ... terms of the compromise. Therefore, when the
compromise is recorded by this Court and the writ petition has
been disposed of in terms
challenged the same by preferring the above writ petition.
3. During the pendency of the writ petition, the
petitioner-society and the second respondent ... filing a compromise petition under Order
XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure.
The said compromise petition signed
this Court. This Court had
refused to grant interim relief. In Writ Petition, compromise
document was filed by the respondent/school and the petitioner that ... 2396/04
4
5th Pay Commission also. In terms of this compromise, Writ Petition
No. 27/2000 of the respondent/school came to be disposed
Thus, this Court has no inhibition in allowing the writ
petition in terms of the compromise dated 19.07.2017.
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed ... Appellate Authority. The
parties shall be bound by the said compromise.
The writ petition stands allowed in the above terms. The
application (APPLW No. 3772
