Search Results Page

Search Results

81 - 90 of 37450 (8.52 seconds)

B.Nalina vs Arumugam on 27 April, 2011

defendants colluded themselves and entered into a compromise and pursuant to which, a compromise decree was passed on 07.02.2003. In the said suit, the plaintiffs ... Muthumukumarasamy Chettiar and there was a compromise and pursuant to which, a compromise decree was passed on 07.02.2003. Since the plaintiffs (the grand-daughters
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 3 - R Subbiah - Full Document

Chhedi vs Smt. Indrapati on 25 April, 1972

appearance in the case and file the compromise. The entire proceedings were fraudulent and the alleged compromise decree was not binding on her. She, therefore ... court and file the compromise petition. She never consented to the terms of the compromise and the decree was not binding
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
Previous   5 6 7 8 9   10 11 12 13 14 Next