party to a consent decree
to avoid such consent decree, is to approach the court which recorded the
compromise and made a decree in terms ... validity of
the agreement or compromise on which it is made. The second defendant, who
challenged the consent compromise decree was fully aware of this
would not have been
a party to the aforesaid compromise deed and the said
compromise decree having been obtained by practising fraud is
a nullity ... said Title Suit No.241 of 2001 ended in compromise and
compromise decree was passed on 24.12.2001. As per the
said compromise, an amount
decree or order of a
Court except a decree or order
expressed to be made on a
compromise and comprising
immovable property other than
that ... apparent that the
decree would not require
registration.
(4) If the decree were not to
embody the terms of compromise, as
was the position
thereby violated the terms of compromise. Alleging that the respondent has violated the terms of compromise decree, Appellant filed ... compromise, parties have agreed that the custody of minor Rahul to remain with mother and father to have visitation rights. Recording the compromise, compromise decree
alleging that based on compromise memo, compromise decree was passed in C.S.No.277 of 2009 and that the Court has no jurisdiction ... that learned Judge has gone beyond the scope of compromise and as per the compromise decree, Respondents 1 and 3 would be entitled only
passing a final decree in terms of the Preliminary Decree. A compromise memo was filed and decree was passed pursuant to the compromise memo ... Order recording compromise could be recalled.
15. Joint compromise memo was filed on 02.05.1988. Challenging the compromise Decree, the Plaintiff has filed Petition
open to the Plaintiff - Decree-Holder Association to execute the Decree.
8. The compromise Decree in O.S.No.4/1970 is a self contained ... proceedings to execute the terms of the compromise.
18. Suit is of the year 1970. Compromise Decree was passed on 23.02.1983. It is very unfortunate
said compromise also
anticipated a possible question on the merits and legality of the compromise.
The case of the defendants is that the compromise estops ... that the
plaintiffs are not estopped from questioning the compromise and the said
compromise decree is not binding on the principle of res judicata
cited to contend that if not vitiated by fraud, or misrepresentation, compromise decree is binding on parties and operates as res judicata between the parties ... compromise, High Court will be within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings.
38. There is no dispute that a compromise decree is binding
entered into a compromise. In pursuance of that, a compromise decree has been passed on 22.01.1997. As per the compromise decree, the first plaintiff will ... They entered into a compromise memo under Ex.P5 on 20.01.1997. Even though a compromise decree was passed
