Aforesaid Original suit was decreed on 3.11.1996, on the basis of a compromise between plaintiff and defendants, dated 5.2.1996.Complainant's father ... share of it was bestowed on him. It seems that compromise decree was executed and it attained finality as none of the contesting sides
Ajmer Rent Control Act . In that case, the decree sought to be evented was a compromise decree; and the Supreme Court pointed out that ... that case also, tho decree sought to be executed was a compromise decree; and therefore, the reasoning given in the earlier decisions of the Supreme
decree
and that a decree holder is entitled to execute the executable
part of the decree irrespective of whether a decree is drawn ... original decree of the first Court was sought to be executed on the ground
that no decree in terms of the compromise having been prepared
restraining the first defendant, his men and representatives, etc., from executing the compromise decree and for other reliefs. The suit is filed ... minor challenging the compromise decree on the ground that on the day the compromise decree was entered into the plaintiff was a minor
held that where time for payment was fixed by the compromise decree, the Court had no power to grant instalments under Order 20 Rule ... case of a compromise decree, wherein the learned Judge held that in a case of a compromise decree the executing Court could not go behind
Execution case. According to the landlord, the decree for eviction, incorporating the terms of compromise, was not executable; it was also contended that, the tenant ... comprising within itself the terms of the compromise. What is sought to be executed, is the decree under proviso (j) to Section 21(1) . Unless
Civil Judge recorded the compromise and passed a decree in terms of the compromise. That compromise decree passed by the Court of the Civil Judge ... sought to be executed. The Executing Court cannot refuse to execute a decree on the ground that the decree is improper and erroneous
demolishing the shops
of the decree holders whose names were shown in Schedule
B alongwith compromise decree till the judgment debtors
would make temporary adjustment ... respondent
nos.1 & 2 that the compromise decree had become in-
executable because of sanction of new development plan
which had come into force
compromise with defendant No. 3, and ultimately, the said suit ended in a compromise, and in terms of which, a compromise decree was passed ... resultant compromise decree, he not being a party to the said suit, now cannot seek to challenge the compromise decree passed therein. She thus prayed
perusal of the compromise decree, it is clear that each party
was required to fulfill certain conditions for acquiring the share of
the other party ... assistance of the executing
court for compliance of the decree. Therefore, the compromise
decree became executable at the instance of a party on the
default
