compromise decree is only a declaration then the decree would be declaratory but if the compromise requires a party to do something then the decree ... decree-holder had the right to execute the executable part of the decree irrespective of the question whether a decree was actually drawn
compromise decree is only a declaration then the decree would b? declaratory but if the compromise requires a party to do something then the decree ... decree holder had the right to execute the executable part of the decree irrespective of the questfon whether a decree was actually drawn
under clause 15 of the
compromise decree. The decree is sought to be executed by
directing the Bank of India to immediately ... decree holder to have the
fruits of the decree should be preferred, but the same will have no
application to compromise decree. The decree holder
suit in view of pending execution petition in Bhiwani for executing compromise decree dated 11th March, 1987 in Suit No. 15/86. The present suit ... earlier occasions. So much so in the year 1987 a compromise decree was passed by the Court of Saharanpur in favor of plaintiffs
compromise, the petitioner decree-holder filed an application for execution of the decree on 9th October. 1969 in which she prayed that the decree ... raised was that the compromise decree for recovery of the mortgage-deed which was compromised and a decree upon compromise .directed the sale
decree holder. The decree holder could not, therefore, seek
execution of the compromise decree and require the judgment debtor to
execute the sale deed ... decree-holder, in
terms of the compromise decree. The judgement debtor shall, within two
weeks of the decree holder calling upon him to execute
basis of the settlement between the parties did yield a
compromise decree executable in law. This endeavor was resisted
by the predecessor in interest
basis of the settlement between the parties did yield a
compromise decree executable in law. This endeavor was resisted
by the predecessor in interest
DBPL through Divij Mehra
on the ground that the Compromise Decree was executed on behalf of
DBPL through R.K. Nanda who in fact ... filed for Compromise Decree did
not bear the signature of all the Parties:
113. The other ground on which the Compromise Decree is claimed
DBPL through Divij Mehra
on the ground that the Compromise Decree was executed on behalf of
DBPL through R.K. Nanda who in fact ... filed for Compromise Decree did
not bear the signature of all the Parties:
113. The other ground on which the Compromise Decree is claimed
