attorney, the parties also entered into a
compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was passed
Suit No. 164/2005 S.Tarjit Singh ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was
passed on 21/04/1995 which is Ex.DW1/4. This compromise decree ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
competent authorities seeking permission to
execute such deeds, sign all forms, vakalath,
deeds etc., apply for permission and execute the
deeds, receive amount, issue receipts ... documents from the court, give
evidence, obtain decree, execute the same or
enter into compromise or to approach higher
court.
10. And generally
compromised as per the
terms of compromise petition. The compromise decree was passed
on 02.03.2009 and decree was drawn on 11.03.2009. Thereby, the
present defendants ... compromise took place before the court
is disclosed. No material on record that, the very compromise and
27 O.S.No.6769/2006
compromise decree
attorney, the parties also entered
into a compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was
Suit No. 162/2005 S.Tarjit Singh ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was
passed on 21/04/1995 which is Ex.DW1/4. This compromise decree ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
money-decree (exh. 46) mentioned above. Daulat Shimpi, therefore, filed execution proceedings- Darkhast No. 48 of 1949-to execute the money decree mentioned above ... money decree by compromise sold 8 acres and 36 gunthas out of S. No. 90 and thus fully satisfied the said money-decree. Necessary sanction
contended by
the respondents that the decrees obtained by filing
compromise petitions are fraudulent inasmuch as the
society had filed the suit and the person ... judgment and decree can be considered to have been
obtained by fraud while taking note of the decree in
these proceedings when there
execution of the registration of the sale deed in
compliance with the compromise and the 1st defendant
refused to come to the Sub Registry Office ... defendant contended that the plaintiff
was not ready and willing to execute the document
Shri Ramesh Chand vs Suresh Chand & Anr. on 9 April, 2012
Author: Valmiki J
