agreement
to sale dated 03.08.2007 executed by defendant no.1 to 7 in
favour of defendant no.8, compromise decree passed in
Special Civil Suit ... sale deed dated 13.03.2009 executed by Court Commissioner
in favour of defendant no.8 in the process of executing
compromise decree in execution proceedings
agreement
to sale dated 03.08.2007 executed by defendant no.1 to 7 in
favour of defendant no.8, compromise decree passed in
Special Civil Suit ... sale deed dated 13.03.2009 executed by Court Commissioner
in favour of defendant no.8 in the process of executing
compromise decree in execution proceedings
attorney, the parties also entered into a
compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was passed
Suit No. 164/2005 S.Tarjit Singh ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was
passed on 21/04/1995 which is Ex.DW1/4. This compromise decree ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
came forward and agreed for a compromise.
In pursuance of the compromise petition, a final decree was
passed in O.S.No.4186/2008 ... properties annexed to the compromise
decree. As per the compromise decree, the defendants 2 to 15
20 O.S.No.5597/11,5599/11,
5600
compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was
passed on 21/04/1995 which is Ex.DW1/4. This compromise decree ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
attorney, the parties also entered
into a compromise in the pending case wherein the compromise decree was
Suit No. 162/2005 S.Tarjit Singh ... sell, the execution of power
of attorney and compromise decree, the plaintiffs had not executed the sale-
deed. One of the agents appointed
learned Counsel also submitted that the compromise proposed to be recorded is definitely a contingent compromise and such compromise cannot be recorded.
7. Heard both ... execute a relinquishment deed or get the decree registered. Therefore, the condition imposed by the appellate Court is beyond the terms of the compromise entered
dated 12.1.2007 is
not sustainable in view of the fact that a compromise was
arrived at between the parties before the court of Sh. Satish ... petition filed to execute the award, is to be
believed as true, they admittedly did not take action against
the compromise decree dated 31.1.2007 passed
that a party alleging fraud cannot be allowed to avoid the compromise admittedly executed by it in proceedings started by an application under Order ... lawful compromise, the court has no option but to order such compromise to be recorded and pass a decree in accordance thereof.
In the case
