Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 982 (1.21 seconds)

Sulochana vs Thiru. R.Sivasamy on 24 May, 2017

compromise memo, dated 10.08.2007 shall part and parcel of this compromise decree. 2.2. Pursuant to the compromise decree dated 10.08.2007, the plaintiff paid the entire ... Executing Court is merely on technical grounds. The Executing Court ought to have taken into account that the decree to be executed is a compromise
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Vimala - Full Document

Sulochana vs Thiru. R.Sivasamy on 24 May, 2017

compromise memo, dated 10.08.2007 shall part and parcel of this compromise decree. 2.2. Pursuant to the compromise decree dated 10.08.2007, the plaintiff paid the entire ... Executing Court is merely on technical grounds. The Executing Court ought to have taken into account that the decree to be executed is a compromise
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Vimala - Full Document

Shri Madhu vs Smt.Muniyamma on 18 March, 2017

2012 No.1 property has manage to get compromise decree and executed the same, as such the said Sale Deed is not binding ... compromise decree entered into between defendant No.2 with defendants 1 and 3 dated 31.03.2009 is binding on the parties. According to the compromise petition
Bangalore District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next