with reference to land at VESU was void abinito as same
was executed without taking prior permission of collector under section
43(1) of Tenancy ... submitted that an agreement or compromise
being void or voldable under the Indian Contract Act , no decree in
any form whether conditional or unconditional could
Vodafone India Services Private Ltd.,, ... vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 23 January
Shri Krishnadas G. Parikh vs Dy. Cit (Asst.), Sr-2 on 24 November, 2006
Equivalent
The Ito, Ward-3(1)(2),, Vadodara vs M/S. Krishna Developers,, Vadodara on 28
Jayesh Dave and Shri Upendra N.Patel, on the
basis of final compromise agreement entered into by the
respective parties dated 30.09.2000, which was duly ... Narendra R. Patel
approved by the jurisdictional Civil Court, Baroda vide
compromise decree dated 03.10.2000. As per the MOU
dated 01.11.1996, Shri Lalit M.Patel
Sapnaben Dipakbhai Patel,, Ahmedabad vs Assessee on 13 January, 2016
आयकर अपील
य अ धकरण
Dr. K.M. Shah vs Assistant Commissioner Of Gift Tax on 15 March, 2004
Equivalent
Smitaben S.Patel, Baroda vs Assessee on 24 August, 2012
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,
अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद
Dr. K.M. Shah vs The Asstt. Commissioner Of Gift-Tax on 28 November, 2003
The Dcit, Circle-1(1)(2),, Baroda vs M/S. Sayaji Hotels Ltd, Vadodara on
