Manoj
Kumar Sharma from 05.07.2003 to 09.12.2016 cannot be
treated as compulsory waiting period as he had been given
posting but he did not comply ... work from 05.07.2003 till 09.12.2016 and it cannot be treated as
compulsory waiting period under the provisions of Fundamental
4
Rules
wherein challenge is to an order dated
18.01.1996, whereby the petitioner was compulsory retired in terms of
Rule 3.26 of Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume ... compulsory retirement.
In the present case, though the action was taken on the basis of
the report of integrity doubtful without waiting for the representation
without waiting for the Central
Government to clean up the MCI, took the lead and passed a
Resolution dated 20.10.2017, making it compulsory
The State Of Bihar vs Devendra Sharma on 17 October, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019
Association Of Medical Super ... vs Union Of India on 19 August, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
enactment of the 1948 Act, which was an act to provide for
compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings, preventing
fragmentation of agricultural holdings and for assignment ... ponds or tanks; village watercourses or
water channels; village bus stands and waiting
places; manure pits; hada rori; public latrines;
cremation and burial grounds, Panchayat
U.P. Awas Evam Vikash Parishad vs Asha Ram(D) Th. Lrs on 23 March
Devas Multimedia Private Limited vs Antrix Corporation Limited on 17 January, 2022
Author: V. Ramasubramanian
Madras Bar Association vs Union Of India on 14 July, 2021
Author: L. Nageswara Rao
Mukesh Rao vs The High Court Of Punjab & Haryana And ... on 18 December, 2012
