proposal to Commissioner of Agriculture,
Chennai for treating the period as compulsory wait
and for payment of salary to petitioner (copy of
proposal enclosed
petitioner is permitted to join duty as Office Assistant as
'Compulsory wait' as has been contemplated under Fundamental Rules
9(6)(3) with ... petitioner is permitted to join duty as Office Assistant as 'Compulsory wait'
as has been contemplated under Fundamental Rules 9(6)(3) with
regularization of the period
between 03.06.2005 & 17.03.2006 (288 days) as compulsory wait and
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... regularization of the period between 03.06.2005 to
17.03.2006 (288 days) as compulsory wait and that of the suspension
period between 22.09.2009 to 31.07.2011 (677 days
writ petitions filed by the petitioner, she was placed
under compulsory wait for the period from 17.09.2008 to 14.10.2010.
Without getting wages for the period
hence, the petitioner was under the impression that he was under compulsory wait. Hence, there is no fault on the part of the petitioner
date
of permitting her to join duty as a period of compulsory wait and grant
her all consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mohanraj ... date of permitting her to join
duty as a period of compulsory wait and grant her all consequential
benefits.
2. When the matter is taken
period from 25.10.1989 to 04.12.1991 as
of duty or as compulsory wait and directing the Respondents to pay salary
for the said period.
For Petitioner
petitioner from 11.12.2010 to 15.05.2011 by
treating the said period as compulsory wait and to pay all service and other
consequential benefits legally entitled ... petitioner from
11.12.2010 to 15.05.2011 by treating the said period as compulsory wait and
to pay all service and other consequential benefits legally entitled
with the job
and he was continued to be kept under compulsory wait.
2. The appellant has also approached this Court by way of writ ... payment of salary by keeping the writ petitioner
under compulsory wait. Without doing so, rejecting the request would
only amount to non-compliance
V.B.R.Menon vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 11 October, 2016
Author
