Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

service  from 29 years  to 30 years as tenable.   However, the compulsory waiting period was treated as  qualifying service as directed

promotion. The period be treated as ,,,,only ,,,,,,,,duty on compulsory waiting. Therefore, the OA is partly allowed, directing the respondents to give him the benefits

Shri S. Rajguru vs Union Of India Through on 1 February, 2013 Central Administrative Tribunal

Dr. Santokh Singh (Retired) vs Union Of India Through on 21 October, 2013 Central Administrative

Dr. Akshay Bahadur vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 28 May, 2013 IN THE

issue. We have already found that it is not a case of compulsory retirement in lieu of or by way of punishment or with ... former Secretary (R) who has admittedly been his patron. Yet, he waited for him to retire before making wild allegations against him which

Dr. Dharamendra Singh vs Union Of India And Others Through on 30 August, 2013 CENTRAL

M/S Gajjala Madhusudhan Reddy-Huf,, ... vs Assessee on 25 March, 2013 IN THE INCOME

Sh. Ranjit Singh, Sangrur vs Assessee on 23 December, 2013 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE

Shamsher Singh Dullo, Khanna vs Assessee on 16 May, 2013 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE