Bellary, he requested the
government to treat his absence as compulsory waiting
period. The said request was rejected by the government.
Aggrieved by the rejection ... request to treat the period
in question as compulsory waiting period, the respondent
approached the tribunal. Before the tribunal, the
government contended that the respondent
direct the respondent to treat the waiting period as compulsory wait (ie) 06.04.1988 to 18.04.1993 and give all consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani ... point that arises for consideration herein is as to whether the compulsory wait period of the petitioner for want of posting orders shall be treated
respondents to treat the period between 11.06.1997 and 08.03.1999 as compulsory wait (duty for all purposes) and consequently revise and refix the pay, retiral ... respondents to treat the period between 11.06.1997 and 08.03.1999 as compulsory wait (duty for all purposes) and consequently refix and pay all retiral and pensionary
laying off all the employees, put the appellant and others on compulsory wait, paying them full salary for 7 = months and then employed them ... laying off all the employees, put the appellant and others on compulsory wait paying them full salary for 7 = months and then employed them
respondents to treat the period from 09.11.2009 to 27.08.2010 as compulsory
waiting period and to pay all monetary benefits including the salary for the
period ... Electricity Board to treat the period from 09.11.2009 to
27.08.2010 as compulsory waiting period and to pay all monetary benefits
including salary
orders on his request to treat the period of absence as
compulsory waiting period. By an order dated
30.09.2005, the period of absence from ... that period from 20.07.1998 to
30.12.2001 requires to be treated as compulsory waiting
period and consequent reliefs has to be granted. The
contention
consequently to direct the appellants herein to treat period from 23.10.1998 compulsory wait and pay arrears of salary and other attendant benefits ... issued with further posting orders. When he was thus on compulsory wait, the third appellant issued a charge memo dated 27.09.1999 under Rule
rule and ‘no work, yet pay’, is the
exception. Compulsory waiting period is one such exception. But to
qualify for the exception, an employee ... period between 24.02.1986 to 16.07.1991 is to be treated as a
compulsory waiting period. It is in fact a voluntary waiting period.
10. Accordingly
dated 06.03.2013 the appellant had been
put on compulsory wait.
19. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the appellant
informed this court
administrative reasons and one Deputy Director was relieved and kept under compulsory wait. The petitioners in these writ petitions have not joined