State Through Reference vs Ram Singh & Ors. on 13 March, 2014
Author: Reva Khetrapal
Senior Scientific Officer and Head of the
Department of Computer Forensic Division, CFSL testified that he
had examined the hard disk of the CCTV footage
passed the final order.
In the impugned order the computer forensic report has also been considered by clearly recording that all hardware are running normally
envelop
was received in the physics division of FSL, Rohini
through Computer Forensic Unit of FSL. On opening the
envelop, one pen drive
PW48 M.
Krishna, Assistant government Examiner, Computer Forensic
Division, Directorate of Forensic Science, Ministy of Home Affairs,
Ramanthapur, Hyderabad proved his detailed report ... report given by M. Krishna, Assistant
government Examiner, Computer Forensic Division, Directorate of
Forensic Science, Ministy of Home Affairs, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad.
The relevant portion
Waghmare has deposed that on 02.04.2012
he was posted at Computer Forensic Unit of the FSL, Rohini Delhi and on
that day one sealed cloth
exhibited on record his examination
report as Ex.PW27/A, computer forensic unit
report
prepared by him Ex.PW35/A. PW37 Dr. Sweta Sinha, Forensic
expert proved and exhibited on record her report qua viscera of
deceased ... behalf of the accused persons.
31. PW38 Sh. Kailash Kumar, JFACE, Computer
Forensic Unit proved and exhibited on record his report
pertaining to retrieving
State vs . : Sarthak Kapoor on 18 August, 2018
IN THE COURT OF ASJ/PILOT COURT
referred to the evidence of PW76 Gautam Roy, HoD,
Computer Cell, Forensic Division who has examined the
CCTV Footage received