Yogendra Kumar Jaiswal Etc. vs State Of Bihar . on 10 December, 2015
Yogendra Kumar Jaiswal Etc. vs State Of Bihar . on 10 December, 2015
Author: Dipak Misra
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2700 (1.80 seconds)Delhi High Court Bar Association & Anr. vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 9 October, 2013
List I (the ‗Union
List' of matters with respect to which Parliament has the exclusive
power to legislate); List II (the ‗State List ... matters on this List, but not including fees
taken in any Court.
List III (Concurrent List)
Entry 11A - ―Administration of justice;
constitution and organization
Security Association & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 April, 2014
under List-II or List-
III, the Parliament is supreme and there is no need for the legislations to
be in the concurrent list before ... subjects enumerated in the Concurrent
List (List –III), on which both the Union and the State Legislatures have
concurrent powers to legislate on the same
Minor S. Aswin Kumar vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 27 April, 2007
entry is in specific terms in List I, the entry in List I takes effect notwithstanding the entry in List II. This is also ... While reading the three lists, List I has priority over Lists III and II and List III has priority over List II. However, still
State Of Mysore vs K. Mohamed Ismail on 20 December, 1957
Legislature of a State in regard to a matter in the Concurrent List; and a law made by Parliament in regard to the same subject ... List II would come within item (37) of List II itself, and have been expressly excluded from item (1) of the Concurrent List. The ancillary
Government Of Tamilnadu vs K. Sevanthinatha Pandarasannathi on 6 March, 2009
enactment by the Parliament on the same matter enumerated in the Concurrent List and then, the State enactment should have been reserved for consideration ... matter enumerated in the State List.
11. With respect to matters enumerated in the List III (Concurrent List), both the Parliament and the State legislature
P. Achiah Chetty And Ors. vs State Of Mysore And Ors. on 3 March, 1961
P. Achiah Chetty And Ors. vs State Of Mysore And Ors. on 3 March, 1961
Ram Lal And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 3 June, 2004
Legislature. List I of the 7th Schedule known as Union List enumerates subjects on which Parliament has exclusive jurisdiction to make laws. List ... State List, enumerates the matters on which State Legislature has exclusive jurisdiction to make laws and list 3, referred to as concurrent list
Baban Chaubey And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 17 February, 1989
specified in List I; municipal tramways, ropeways; inland waterways and traffic thereon subject to the provisions of List I and List III with regard ... specific terms in List I, the entry in List I takes effect notwithstanding the entry in List II. This is also on the principle that
Tamizhazhagan And Anr. vs The Revenue Divisional Officer And Ors. on 3 January, 1966
found either under List II of the Seventh Schedule, the State List, or under List III, the Concurrent List. The Advocate-General appearing ... matters in List I or List. II. The language of the head does not warrant this limitation. From the Concurrent List is excluded only offences