Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the concurrent
findings of the Courts below convicting and sentencing the revision
petitioner/A1 to undergo: rigorous ... conviction and sentenced imposed by
the trial Court as confirmed by the appellate Court is confirmed. The
accused shall undergo the sentences concurrently. The bail
Rigorous imprisonment for six months
2.2 The aforesaid sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The
appeal preferred by the convict prisoner ... both the
Central Government and State Government have concurrent power but if
the offender is sentenced on two different counts, both could be the appro
Additional Sessions Court, Coimbatore. He was convicted
on 06.02.2001 and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence
under Section 302 IPC and one year ... whereof, to undergo one month rigorous imprisonment. The said sentences were
ordered to run concurrently.
b Ibrahim assailed his conviction and sentence before this Court
various
Sessions cases or in not making them run concurrently with the sentence
awarded in the first Sessions Trial
convicted and sentenced the petitioner as under :
Provision under Sentence
which convicted
Section 498A IPC 1 year rigorous imprisonment and fine ... default to undergo
3 months simple imprisonment
The aforesaid sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The appeal in
C.A.No.152 of 2010 filed
State By vs Jacob on 26 June, 2014
Author: P.N.Prakash
Bench: P.N
Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 (for brevity the Suspension of Sentence Rules) for making arrangements, participating and solemnising marriage of the petitioner ... dismissed on 01.02.2007 with a modification that the sentences imposed by the Trial Court should run concurrently, instead of consecutively.
2.2 According to the petitioner
dated 28.03.2003, the Trial Court convicted and
sentenced the accused, as detailed below:-
Accused Section of Sentence of Fine amount
Law imprisonment ... years
http://www.judis.nic.in
3
The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Challenging the said
conviction and sentence, the appellant (A2) has preferred
2006
convicted and sentenced the accused as follows:
S.No. Charged for the commission of Conviction and
offence Sentence
1. Sections 279 IPC 6 months ... Section 304(A) One year Rigorous
Imprisonment
The sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the accused was
http://www.judis.nic.in
5
granted
sentenced the petitioner as under :
http://www.judis.nic.in
4/12
CRL.R.C.No.497 of 2014
Provision under Sentence
which convicted
Section ... Section 354 IPC 2 years rigorous imprisonment
The aforesaid sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the petitioner
was acquitted of the offences under Sections
