appellants were sentenced to 3 years under each
of the counts. However, all the sentences were directed to run
concurrently.
2. The sole appellant ... undergo 2 years extra simple imprisonment. All the sentences were
directed to run concurrently.
3. The prosecution case in short, as made
appellants were sentenced to 3 years under each
of the counts. However, all the sentences were directed to run
concurrently.
2. The sole appellant ... undergo 2 years extra simple imprisonment. All the sentences were
directed to run concurrently.
3. The prosecution case in short, as made
vide order, dated 29.11.2010 was
sentenced to undergo 1 month SI. However, all the sentences were
directed to run concurrently.
2. The prosecution case ... imprisonment for two months under each count. However, all the
sentences would run concurrently.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
(Arun Kumar, J)
Shashi.
AFR/NAFR NAFR
attempt made by the appellant for suspension of sentence
and his release on bail, by filing an interlocutory
application, bearing ... rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year. Both the
sentences are to run concurrently.
3. The dates of judgment of conviction and
the order
sentence of life imprisonment passed by the
trial Court under Section 364A and 377 of the Indian Penal Code are
maintained, whereas the sentence passed ... undergo additional
imprisonment for one month. However, all the sentences are directed
to run concurrently.
40. With the aforesaid modification in sentence, the
judgment
Arising of the judgment of conviction dated 30.01.2016 and
order of sentence dated 06.02.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions
Judge IV, Khagaria in Sessions Trial ... under section 27 of the
Arms Act. Both the sentences are directed to run concurrently.
Patna High Court
sentenced to
undergo imprisonment for one year and two years
respectively for the said offences, with the sentences to run
concurrently, by judgment and order ... affirmed the trial Court's judgment of conviction and order
of sentence. In that background, the petitioners have filed
the present criminal revision application
common judgment of
conviction, dated 19.5.2009 and order of sentence, dated
Patna High Court ... been sentenced to undergo RI for five years. Both the sentences
have been directed to run concurrently.
3. The sole appellant Arun Kumar Modi @ Munna
section 376(2)(g) of the I.P.C., they have been sentenced to
Rigorous Imprisonment for life and a fine ... they have been sentenced to three years
imprisonment. However, all the sentences were directed to run
concurrently.
3. The prosecution case as unfolded
have been awarded death sentence. For the offence under
Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code, they have been sentenced to life
imprisonment along with ... have been
awarded 05 years rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences have been
directed to run concurrently.
3. The prosecution case, in short, as stated
