fine
of Rs.500/- U/s 448 of IPC .
Above sentences shall run concurrently, hence total punishment
sentenced to Shri Madegowda B is simple imprisonment ... fine of
Rs.500/- U/s 448 of IPC .
Above sentences shall run concurrently, hence total
punishment sentenced to Shri Madegowda B is simple
imprisonment
said Act with the stipulation
that both the sentences shall run concurrently and
with further stipulation that in case of the applicant's
failure ... said Act with the stipulation that both the
sentences shall run concurrently and with further
stipulation that in case of the applicant's failure
Corruption Act. Under the relevant sections he has been
sentenced to concurrent sentences of seven years, two years of
impressments and five years of vigorous
Prevention of Corruption Act , with both sentences
directed to run concurrently.
3.3 It is submitted that the applicant preferred a
criminal appeal before ... under the respective provisions, with
sentences directed to run concurrently.
4.2 It is submitted that upon consideration of the
conviction, the competent authority, namely
Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 respectively. Both sentences were
directed to be run concurrently.
3.1 The Applicant, filed a Criminal Appeal No 289/2014
(Prabhu ... Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 respectively with both sentences to
run concurrently, therefore, proceedings were initiated
under Rule 9 of Pension Rules and .after. giving
further undergo
simple imprisonment for six months. He was also sentenced to
undergo imprisonment for three years and six months with a fine ... months. Both the
substantive sentences were to run concurrently. However, the
sentences in default of payment of fine would run conjointly.
9
Item
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947;
and directed that all these sentences would concurrently. Being aggrieved,
the applicant filed Criminal Appeal ... with direction for all the sentences to run concurrently. By the date of
judgment of conviction, i.e., 7.1.2009, passed in Corruption Case
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947;
and directed that all these sentences would concurrently. Being aggrieved,
the applicant filed Criminal Appeal ... Prevention of Corruption Act,
1947, with direction for all the sentences to run concurrently. By the date of
judgment of conviction, i.e., 7.1.2009, passed
undergo SI for a period
of six months. Both the sentences shall run
concurrently and the convict shall be entitled to
benefit under Section ... undergo SI for a period
of six months. Both the sentences shall run
concurrently and the convict shall be entitled to
benefit under section
Corruption Act, with the stipulation that all the substantive sentences shall run concurrently. Applicant filed a Criminal Appeal before the High Court of Delhi ... Corruption Act, with the stipulation that all the substantive sentences shall run concurrently.
AND WHEREAS the undersigned propose to award an appropriate penalty under Rule
