time of hearing cannot be
accepted. Thus, the question of concurrent-user does not arise. Even
otherwise there is no honesty on the part ... party who has stolen the mark cannot claim the
benefit of concurrent user because the governing principle of
concurrent user lies on account of honesty
Mind Gym Ltd. vs Mindgym Kids Library Pvt. Ltd. on 21 March, 2014
Author: Manmohan
would be in fav0uor of the plaintiffs, to ensure
that by concurrent user, during the period of the trial, no
other rights come into existence
Win-Medicare Pvt Ltd vs Galpha Laboratories Ltd & Ors on 4 January, 2016
Author
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs Aureate Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. on 30 July, 2012
Author
honest
user. In the present case the application for registration was filed in
2004 with the user of 2004. The question of concurrent and honest ... conduct shows that
there had been, on its part, an honest concurrent user of the
mark in question. If a party, for no apparent
Pranic Healing, authored
by the Master and therefore, she is the concurrent user of Modern Pranic
Healing and the copyright owner. Defendant
similar mark as opposed to the same mark, the
concurrent user coupled with delay might be a ground for
refusing an injunction. However, when
would be in favour of the plaintiffs, to ensure
that by concurrent user, during the period of the trial, no
other rights come into existence
would be in fav0uor of the plaintiffs, to ensure
that by concurrent user, during the period of the trial, no
other rights come into existence
