making the injunction conditional on complying with certain conditions imposed by the learned single Judge. Such conditions were mutual and reciprocal obligations. The Division Bench ... interim injunction. After satisfied that the learned single Judge was correct in granting injunction, this Court was concerned only with the conditions imposed
based on title for permanent injunction. The injunction was also not granted in perpetuity, but, was conditional one. Hence, the finding operates as res judicata ... permanent injunction which was issued in favour of defendant respondent was interdicted by the deposit, as the decree for injunction was conditional and the condition
workshop with machines in the suit
premises and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from
running the workshop. The Trial Court granted a decree consisting ... plaintiff cannot challenge that part of the decree which
granted conditional injunction without filing the cross-objection. The
Division Bench drew a distinction between
TOYOTA
DEVICE’ marks) except in accordance with the
terms of the conditional injunction order passed
by the Division Bench dated ... plaintiff (‘TOYOTA’, ‘TOYOTA INNOVA’ and ‘TOYOTA
DEVICE MARKS’); the conditional injunction Order
dated 10.08.2000; the violation thereof; all have
been urged by Shri Chidambaram
alternative to the blanket order of temporary
injunction, a further interlocutory prayer was also made that the injunction as
sought could remain in force till ... agreement. The Division Bench modified the order
impugned by making the injunction conditional upon a sum of Rs. 30 lakh not
being deposited
form of the injunction given by the lower Court, Mr. Ramdoss asked
(i) that the decree must make the injunction conditional on the execution
entitled to get conditional prohibitory injunction. Therefore, learned trial court decreed the suit of permanent injunction but granted conditional prohibitory injunction as mentioned above.
Learned ... that learned trial court has committed a mistake in granting conditional prohibitory injunction. The condition imposed by trial court is against law because no objection
decree so far as it relates to the granting of conditional injunction even without filing cross-objection we have looked into the decision
that it is a fit case for the grant of a
conditional injunction. The defendants are accordingly restrained from
licensing, writing, publishing, hosting or advertising
Where the DRT merely makes the grant of an injunction
conditional upon the deposit of a certain amount, that amount does not
ipso facto constitute
