Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 6562 (1.77 seconds)

Sidheshwar Nath vs Emperor on 11 December, 1933

statements, not as confessions under Section 164 , but as statements of accused persons under Section 364. The statements were not confessions of guilt, but contained ... under Section 164 . The statements did not purport to have been recorded under Section 164 and even if they could be regarded as confessions
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raja Ram vs State on 14 October, 1965

held that: ".....this confession cannot be taken in evidence as a Magistrate can record a confession under Section 164 Criminal Procedure Code during ... accused person to confess at any stage of the inquiry or trial but a record of his confession under Section 164 Cr. P. C. cannot
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sheo Raj vs State on 8 October, 1963

genuine under Section 80 . Section 80 , which is applicant to a confession recorded by a Magistrate under Section 164 of the Code cannot be held ... because it is also recorded by a Magistrate under Section 164 . Section 80 applies to a confession because it is expressly mentioned
Allahabad High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 12 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next