making an effective representation against his detention. The private promise of confidentiality must yield to the general public interest that is served by communication ... order to enable him to make an effective representation against his detention. Confidentiality is not a head of privilege; it is a consideration to bear
Israil @ Israr Pahelvan Nazirahmed ... vs State Of Gujarat on 19 October, 2000
Equivalent citations: 2001CRILJ2209
have breached
their implied and/or express obligations to maintain the
confidentiality of Plaintiff's confidential information about the
HPHT apparatus. The Defendants appear ... acts of
infringing the copyrights coupled with a breach of obligations of
confidentiality and breach of trust, the plaintiff preferred the
Commercial Suit TMCS
proviso of Regulation 20(4) read
with Regulation 35 would indicate that confidentiality
of the information is the spirit of the proceeding and
therefore, there ... Party under
sub-clause (1) or (2) thereof in regard to maintaining
confidentiality of identity and/or document/s or part/s
thereof. Such request
Israil And Israr Pahelvan Nazirahmed ... vs State Of Gujarat on 19 October, 2000
JUDGMENT
H
original applicant that this Section 11 is entirely based upon confidentiality. If the test of confidentiality fails, Section 11 is not applicable and if Section ... representation can be made by the third party as to confidentiality of information as to disclosure of information. This representation can be made orally
making an effective representation against his detention. The private promise of confidentiality must yield to the general public interest that is served by communication ... order to enable him to make an effective representation against his detention. Confidentiality is not a head of privilege; it is a consideration to bear
information had been furnished by the foreign exporters, in
respect of which confidentiality could have been claimed by
them. The only confidential information available before ... based on information furnished by the petitioner, there
can be no confidentiality qua the petitioner. In support of such
submission, reliance was placed upon
action of the plaintiff is for the enforcement of the rights of confidentiality under the Secrecy Act as per the agreement (undertaking) between the plaintiff ... Vakil, while developing his arguments, has submitted that this right of confidentiality is not confined to a process which the plaintiff may have invented
titled as 'Purchase agreements',
End User License Agreements' and Confidentiality Agreements', Invoice
and Terms and Conditions for the purchase of planning ... intention of the parties is also clear from Clause 12
of the Confidentiality agreement entered into between Respondent Nos.
1 to 14 separately
