Atique Ahmed vs State Of U.P. on 3 February, 2012
State Legislative Assembly, Uttar Pradesh from Allahabad for five consecutive terms and was also a Member of Parliament on a Samajwadi Party ticket
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 5188 (1.97 seconds)Abdul Sajed S/O Abdul Sattar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 February, 2011
been elected as Corporator of
Aurangabad Municipal Corporation for second
consecutive term, he is Vice President of
District Congress Committee since 12-13 years
Abdul Sajed S/O Abdul Sattar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 February, 2011
been elected as Corporator of
Aurangabad Municipal Corporation for second
consecutive term, he is Vice President of
District Congress Committee since 12-13 years
Abdul Sajed S/O Abdul Sattar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 February, 2011
been elected as Corporator of
Aurangabad Municipal Corporation for second
consecutive term, he is Vice President of
District Congress Committee since 12-13 years
Suresh Chand vs Ajit Singh Dahiya And Ors on 17 December, 2021
direct life sentence and term sentences to run consecutively.
That aspect was argued keeping in view the fact that the
appellants have been sentenced ... direction affirmed by the High Court is that the
said term sentences shall run consecutively. It was contended
on behalf of the appellants that even
Smt. Pushpanchala Choudhary vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 3 January, 2017
Committee shall be eligible for appointment
for a maximum of two consecutive terms.
(3) Extension of the tenure of members of
the Committee shall
Pramod Tiwari vs Chancellor on 31 October, 2012
Karmchari Sangh, the sole recognized association of the
employees, for two consecutive terms i.e. 2000-2002 and
2002-2004.
4. Similarly, petitioner Rasool Shah
State Of Maharashtra vs Madhukar Wamanrao Smarth on 24 March, 2008
prayed for
grant of bail by suspension of sentence in terms of Section 389
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ... gravity of the
offence the sentences were directed to run consecutively in
terms of Section 31(1) of Code. It was stated that the High
Irfan vs State on 5 February, 2019
where the Trial Court had directed that the sentence shall run
consecutively in terms of Section 31 Cr.P.C.
9. The Supreme Court ... sentences shall run concurrently and not consecutively.
16. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
17. The effect of the above order is that
Ronald James Alvares vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 14 February, 2019
namely whether the Court can direct life sentence and term
sentences to run consecutively. That aspect was argued keeping in view the
fact that ... direction affirmed by the High Court is that the said term sentences shall run
consecutively. It was contended on behalf of the appellants that even