sufficiently
prove that the instant case was a clearly case of consensual
relationship; that the relationship between the appellant ... relationship
with the appellant solely on account of any
assurance of marriage from the appellant. The
relationship between the parties was cordial and also
consensual
body of the victim, and she was in a consensual relationship. She admitted that she was a major girl aged about 20 years. When ... relationship with the appellant solely on account of any assurance of marriage from the appellant. The relationship between the parties was cordial and also consensual
petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, they were in a
consensual relationship and from the said relationship they have
Page 3 of 41
a child ... they even had a child from the said
relationship, clearly indicating that the relationship was
consensual. The Court in paragraph 15 of the said order
complainant were both majors,
known to each other and in a consensual relationship for several years
before the registration of the FIR. It has been ... admitted position that the
parties were in a consensual relationship with each other for several
years prior to the registration of the FIR. The statement
plea
of enmity. There is no suggestion given to prosecutrix
regarding consensual relationship. The paternity of the child
was admitted after the report ... child, which as per him was a product of
consensual relationship though denied by the prosecutrix.
Defence of the accused:
41. The prosecutrix through
instant case was a
Page 5 of 24
clearly case of consensual relationship; that the relationship
between the appellant and respondent No.2 could ... relationship with the
appellant solely on account of any assurance of marriage
from the appellant. The relationship between the parties
was cordial and also consensual
years old son
and had indulged in a consensual relationship with the accused-
appellant. Pursuant thereto, the accused-appellant was formally
arrested ... present
case unmistakably indicate towards a classic case of a consensual
relationship turning acrimonious. Upon perusal of the records of
the case, it is evident
these allegations as it appears to be a case of consensual relationship,
the appellant approached the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of
the FIR being ... This behaviour of the
complainant clearly shows that it was a consensual relationship and
the allegation of rape was concocted only after the appellant refused
petitioner
Smt. K. Abhinaya would vehemently contend that a pure
consensual relationship between the two is projected to
become an offence of rape. She would ... Admittedly,
the appellant and the second respondent were in a
consensual relationship from 2013 until December
punishable under Sections 376 and 417 IPC inasmuch
as he had consensual sexual relationship with her for a long time
under the pretext / false promise ... there was a false promise to marry to begin
with. A consensual relationship turning sour or
partners becoming distant cannot be a ground for
invoking
