consent and free will and she was in
relationship with the petitioner over a significant period of time,
therefore, the consent of prosecutrix ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did
9
not have any intention to marry and the
prosecutrix gave the consent for sexual
intercourse on such
have serious doubts that the promise to
marry induced the prosecutrix to consent to having sexual
intercourse with the appellant. She knew, as we have ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did not
have any intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the consent for
sexual intercourse on such
have
serious doubts that the promise to marry induced the prosecutrix to
consent to having sexual intercourse with the appellant. She knew, as we
have ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did not have any
intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the consent for sexual
intercourse on such
have
serious doubts that the promise to marry induced the prosecutrix to
consent to having sexual intercourse with the appellant. She knew, as we
have ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did not have any
intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the consent for sexual
intercourse on such
have
serious doubts that the promise to marry induced the prosecutrix to
consent to having sexual intercourse with the appellant. She knew, as we
have ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did not have any
intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the consent for sexual
intercourse on such
appellant knew, or had reason
to believe, that the prosecutrix had consented to having sexual intercourse
with him only as a consequence of her belief ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did not have any
intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the consent for sexual
intercourse on such
have serious doubts that the promise to
marry induced the prosecutrix to consent to having sexual
intercourse with the appellant. She knew, as we have ... promise to the prosecutrix
to marry, did not have any intention to marry and the prosecutrix
gave the consent for sexual intercourse on such
have serious doubts that the promise to
marry induced the prosecutrix to consent to having sexual
intercourse with the appellant. She knew, as we have ... promise to the prosecutrix
to marry, did not have any intention to marry and the prosecutrix
gave the consent for sexual intercourse on such
marriage. When the prosecutrix told the
petitioner to solemnized marriage, the petitioner use to ignore the prosecutrix.
Thereafter prosecutrix came back to her house, where ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry,
did not have any intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the
consent for sexual intercourse on such
have
serious doubts that the promise to marry induced the prosecutrix to
consent to having sexual intercourse with the appellant. She knew, as we
have ... promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did not have any
intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the consent for sexual
intercourse on such
