Naval Kumar Alias Rohit Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 9 January, 2015
Naval Kumar Alias Rohit Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 9 January
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 722 (1.06 seconds)Marakkar vs State Of Kerala on 18 September, 2009
scope of the duty; (2)
breach of the said duty; (3) consequential damage.
Cause of action for negligence arises only when
damage occurs; for, damage
Shanti Swaroop Agarwal vs U.P. State Road Transport Corporation on 12 September, 2003
Tort is breach of legal duty to take care, which results in damage undesired by defendant to the plaintiff. Thus there are three ingredients ... scope of duty; (ii) Breach of that duty; (iii) Consequential damage to 'B'.
11. It has been further stated by Win-field that
The Managing Director vs Santhi on 23 June, 2014
duty; (2) breach of the said duty; and (3) consequential damage. Cause of action for negligence arises only when damage occurs; for, damage
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance ... vs Navamani on 7 September, 2015
duty; (2) breach of the said duty; and (3) consequential damage. Cause of action for negligence arises only when damage occurs; for, damage
State Of Jammu And Kashmir vs Zarda Begum And Ors. on 10 February, 2003
scope of the duty;
(ii) Breach of the sordity; and
(iii) Consequential damage.
13. Failure to observe the required caution and safeguards would clearly amount
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Lokesh Verma & Ors on 2 September, 2019
Back light damaged/rear bumper scratched."
7. Whereas for the motorcycle, the following damages were noted:
"22. Details of damage on the vehicle ... larger vehicle is sufficient to send it
tossing over and the consequential damage to its headlight and visor
assembly and right indicator is a corollary
Sagar Chand And Anr. vs State Of J. & K. And Anr. on 26 February, 1999
breach of a duty to take care which results in damage, undesired by the defendant to the plaintiff. This definition involves three constituents of negligence ... duty; (ii) breach of the said duty; and (iii) consequential damage. All these constituents are present in the present case because it was the duty
Shriram vs Mitaben on 16 December, 2010
duty;
(2) breach of the said duty; and (3) consequential damage. Cause of
action for negligence arises only when damage occurs; for, damage
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance ... vs Navamani on 7 September, 2015
duty; (2) breach of the said duty; and (3) consequential damage. Cause of action for negligence arises only when damage occurs; for, damage