unlawful assembly was
only to cause simple injuries and consequential damage to the properties of
the Balmiki community but some persons went beyond this common
unlawful assembly was
only to cause simple injuries and consequential damage to the properties of
the Balmiki community but some persons went beyond this common
unlawful assembly was
only to cause simple injuries and consequential damage to the properties of
the Balmiki community but some persons went beyond this common
unlawful assembly was
only to cause simple injuries and consequential damage to the properties of
the Balmiki community but some persons went beyond this common
unlawful assembly was
only to cause simple injuries and consequential damage to the properties of
the Balmiki community but some persons went beyond this common
unlawful assembly was
only to cause simple injuries and consequential damage to the properties of
the Balmiki community but some persons went beyond this common
unlawful assembly was
only to cause simple injuries and consequential damage to the properties of
the Balmiki community but some persons went beyond this common
along with 18% interest per annum. There the
question was whether the damage caused due to vibration from the operation
of bulldozer ... view
that the damage caused to the building was not due to forcible contact but
due to the consequential effect of vibration on account
circular dated 24th February 2009. This had
the effect of severely damaging the reputation of the Petitioners. The
Petitioners had been pre-qualified ... impugned show cause notice dated 27th June 2008
and the consequential impugned order dated 24 th February 2009 in
principally on the grounds of violation
Section 152 of the Act for the purpose of determination of the
consequential civil liability.
Submissions of learned counsel for the Respondents
12. In reply ... which defines civil
liability to be the loss or damage incurred "due to the commission of an
offence" referred to in Section
