Pratima Bhardwaj vs State Of U.P. & Others on 13 February, 2012
joining report initially i.e. 30.12.2011 with all consequential benefits i.e. salary, seniority etc. This Court order accordingly.
19. However, the amount of salary
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (1.01 seconds)State Of U.P. & Another vs Umesh Chandra Vyas & Another on 30 April, 2012
juniors have been promoted on the basis of seniority in the L.T. Grade with all consequential benefits.
Aggrieved, the petitioners have filed the instant ... years regular service on substantive posts. The criteria for promotion is seniority subject to rejection of unfit as prescribed under Rule 8 of the said
Ashok Kumar Dutta vs Union Of India And Others on 11 May, 2012
direction to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits, continuity in service, seniority and arrears of salary for the suspension period.
3. Brief facts
Naseem Ahmad And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 13 January, 2012
their entitlement in seniority etc. from the date the order of promotion was passed i.e. 14.10.2009 with all consequential benefits. Regarding future vacancies ... seniority etc; and with reference to promotion order dated 14.10.2009, shall be granted promotion from the date of occurrence of the vacancies with all consequential
Umesh Chandra Srivastava & Others vs State Of U.P. & Others on 6 July, 2012
seniority list published and served on 28.8.2008 has disturbed the long-standing seniority position existing in the District Judgeship for the period of more than ... never challenged the order of the District Judge nor the consequential fixation of seniority list. For the first time he staked his claim for original
State Of U.P. & Others (Now Serb) vs Jai Ram Maurya & Others on 9 April, 2012
post and also to give them all consequential service benefits such as arrars of salary allowances and seniority etc.
As indicated above, the quashing
Rajeev Mohan vs C.A.T. Allahabad And Others on 13 April, 2012
benefits of his selection under Maharashtra Region with all consequential benefits. It is further submitted that one Shri Kapil Agarwal who also appeared ... being treated senior to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the seniority list of 1999 was clandestinely changed in the year 2002, putting
Radhey Shyam Saxena vs State Of U.P. And Others on 1 June, 2012
respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefit, continuity of service, seniority, arrears of salary and promotion etc. within a period
Sanjay Kumar vs State Of U.P. And Others on 1 June, 2012
from the date they were appointed in terms of their seniority with all the consequential benefits.
Dated: 01/06/2012
Dr. Kamal Dhawan W/O Sri Kishan Chandra ... vs State Of U.P. & Others on 27 April, 2012
Seniority No.4379); Dr. Vandana Srivastava (Seniority No.4372); Dr. Beena Awasthi (Seniority No.4379); Dr. Poonam Sharma (Seniority No.4413); Dr. Ranjana Agarwal (Seniority ... Reeta Chaterjee (Seniority No.45); Dr. Amita Joshi (Seniority No.13); Dr. Usha Singh (Seniority No.8); Dr. Shaili Mehrotra (Seniority