Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3684 (0.07 seconds)

All India Sc/St Telecom Employees' ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 25 September, 2007

implemented by the Government vide O.M. dated 21.1.2002 providing consequential seniority to the SC/ST. 3. General category candidates were promoted ... candidates and providing the consequential seniority to the reserved category employees. Another seniority list dated 4.9.2002 also provided consequential seniority to the employees
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Bharati M Bakhtiani vs M/O Finance on 3 July, 2025

been raised in respect of grant of reservation in promotion and consequential seniority by challenging the impugned promotion (ad-hoc) order dated 23rd February ... quantifiable data to provide reservation in the matter of promotion or consequential seniority. The respondents have also failed to identify the backwardness of the classes
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bharati M Bakhtiani vs M/O Finance on 15 September, 2025

provide reservation in the matter of promotion or to grant consequential seniority and failed to show reasons to grant reservation in promotion to the post ... basis of seniority-cum- suitability as per original seniority list in feeder cadre of Superintendent with all consequential benefits. Hon'ble Member (Administrative) dissented
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rahul K Dhumal vs M/O Defence on 5 June, 2024

provision for reservation in the matters of promotion' [with consequential seniority, to any class] or classes of posts in the services under the State ... never issued. (iv) (a) On the basis of the revised seniority, consequential benefits like promotion, pay, pension, etc. Should be allowed to the concerned
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next