Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

respondent no. 2 under which he was appointed as a consignment stockist of the company subject to certain terms and conditions. The said agreement

there was an agreement dated 21.2.1995 appointing the appellant as a consignment stockist of respondent No.2-Company. The afore-mentioned agreement contained an arbitration

accused and the complainant whereunder the complainant was appointed as a consignment stockist subject to certain terms and conditions. On expiry, the agreement was extended

that case there had been a contract of consignment stockist between the appellant-Company (appellant before the Supreme Court) and respondent no.2. Respondent

company) and respondent no. 2 who was appointed as consignment stockist of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49450

company) and respondent no. 2 who was appointed as consignment stockist of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49450

under which the complainant/respondent No.2 therein was appointed as consignment stockist of appellant No.1-company, the terms whereof were alleged to have

Stockists. It is alleged that the company had been supplying its products to M/s Jaswant Singh ... sons of District Yamuna Nagar through Super Stockists and the company had been taking payments qua the consignments so delivered and that it was only

Lacs as security deposit for appointment of the complainant as Stockist for the State of Bihar. The complainant disclosed that on different dates ... Mumbai. However, no supply was made despite several telephonic reminders. Only single consignment of goods reached at Patna that, too, in fully damaged condition

Lacs as security deposit for appointment of the complainant as Stockist for the State of Bihar. The complainant disclosed that on different dates ... Mumbai. However, no supply was made despite several telephonic reminders. Only single consignment of goods reached at Patna that, too, in fully damaged condition