also point out that Conditions 1 to 4
mentioned in the Consolidated Engg. case [(2008) 7 SCC 169]
have, in fact, been ... diligence and in good faith, as has been
explained in Consolidated Engg. [(2008) 7 SCC 169] itself.
These phrases only mean that the party
also point out that Conditions 1 to 4
mentioned in the Consolidated Engg. case [(2008) 7 SCC 169]
have, in fact, been ... diligence and in good faith, as has been
explained in Consolidated Engg. [(2008) 7 SCC 169] itself.
These phrases only mean that the party
also point out that Conditions 1 to 4
mentioned in the Consolidated Engg. case [(2008) 7 SCC 169]
have, in fact, been ... diligence and in good faith, as has been
explained in Consolidated Engg. [(2008) 7 SCC 169] itself.
These phrases only mean that the party
support has relied upon the judgment in the
case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary
Irrigation Department ... respondent No. 3 has distinguished the
judgment in the case of Consolidated Engineering (supra) on the ground
that the facts of the said case were
upon the decision of
the Apex Court in the case of Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises Vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation
Department and others , reported ... decision of the Apex
Court in the case of Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises (Supra)
the Apex Court observed at para 21 and 31 as under
places reliance on the judgment rendered by
the Apex court in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs.
Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others ... behalf of the appellants-i.e.[(2008) 7 SCC 169)
( Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and others ), it was a case
where
three Judge
Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises Vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others ... From the above settled legal proposition by the Supreme Court in
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises (supra), it emerges that Section
2017.)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Consolidated Engineering Company
Through its Partner,
Office at K-Block, Chaudhary Building,
Connaught Circus,
New Delhi - 110001. ...Appellant
Versus ... Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 426 of 2020; Consolidated Engineering
company in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 430 of 2020; Infinity Interior
Private Limited
2017.)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Consolidated Engineering Company
Through its Partner,
Office at K-Block, Chaudhary Building,
Connaught Circus,
New Delhi - 110001. ...Appellant
Versus ... Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 426 of 2020; Consolidated Engineering
company in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 430 of 2020; Infinity Interior
Private Limited
2017.)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Consolidated Engineering Company
Through its Partner,
Office at K-Block, Chaudhary Building,
Connaught Circus,
New Delhi - 110001. ...Appellant
Versus ... Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 426 of 2020; Consolidated Engineering
company in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 430 of 2020; Infinity Interior
Private Limited
