2017 Page 8 of 15
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary,
Irrigation Department and Ors. , it is submitted by Mr. Ratan K.
Singh, ld. counsel ... noted only for the
sake of rejection. In Consolidated Engineering Enterprises, the
Supreme Court has expressly ruled that even if sufficient cause is
shown
India vs. Popular
Construction Co. , ( 2001) 8 SCC 470 and
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs.
Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department ,
(2008) 7 SCC 169, held that ... parties.
iv. The mandate of Popular Construction Case (supra)
and Consolidated Engineering Case (supra) wherein
the emphasis on ‘fixed period’ needs to be given effect
placed on a three-Judge Bench decision of this Court in
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and Ors. , 2 which has
enunciated ... particular, of the
decision in the case of Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises (supra). According to the respondents, the
subject suit was barred by limitation
1134/2017 IA ORDER
conditions set out in para 21 of Consolidated Engg.
Enterprises v. Irrigation Deptt.5 , which reads as follows ... upon the decision of the
Supreme Court in the case of Consolidated Engg.
Enterprises v. Irrigation Department , (2008) 7 SCC 169,
wherein the court held
judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department & Ors. reported ... laid down by the Apex Court
in the case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises (supra),
Esha Bhattacharjee (supra) and M.P. Steel Corporation
(supra) laying down
been answered by this Court in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v
Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department8 . This court observed thus:
“At this stage it would be relevant ... relied on Union of India v Popular
Construction Company ( supra) and Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises v Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department (supra) to support
its case
down by a three-
judge bench of the apex court in Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary,
Irrigation Department (AIR 2009 SC [supp ... apex court states in M.P.Steel Corporation
(supra) that in Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises (supra) it is unequivocally held that
the three-judge bench decision
like nature, is unable to entertain it."
5. In Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Irrigation Department ;
(2008) 7 SCC 169, the Hon'ble Supreme
upon the
decision of the Apex Court in the case of Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises Vs. principal Secretary, Irrigation
Department
reference to the Apex
Court's judgement in the case Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department &
others reported
