Consolidated Engg.Enterprises vs Principal Secy. Irrigation Deptt. & Ors on 3 April, 2008
Author: J.M. Panchal
Bench: K.G. Balakrishnan , J.M. Panchal ... CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 2461 of 2008
PETITIONER:
CONSOLIDATED ENGG.ENTERPRISES
RESPONDENT:
PRINCIPAL SECY. IRRIGATION DEPTT. & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/04/2008
BENCH
five conditions set out in paragraph 21 of
Consolidated Engg. Enterprises v. Principal secy., Irrigation Deptt.,
(2008) 7 SCC 169, which reads as follows ... also point out that conditions 1 to 4 mentioned in the
Consolidated Engineering case have, in fact, been met by the
appellant. It is clear
Consolidated Engineering ... vs The Principal Secretary (Irrigation ... on 3 April, 2008
Author: R V Raveendran
Bench: R V Raveendran
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil ... PETITIONER:
M/s. Consolidated Engineering Enterprises
RESPONDENT:
The Principal Secretary (Irrigation Department) & Ors
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/04/2008
BENCH:
R V Raveendran
JUDGMENT
various judgments of this
Court including the one in Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation
Department and others23, which read thus:
“21. “ Section ... Land Acquisition) and another vs. Shah
Manilal Chandulal and others29 and Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises (supra) held, that the word
“court” in Section 14 takes
Consolidated Engineering Co. (P) ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 14 May, 1965
Equivalent citations: AIR1966CAL259, AIR 1966 CALCUTTA 259
JUDGMENT ... India, on the one part, and " Messrs. S. P. Consolidated Engineering Co. (P,) Ltd. near Co-operative. Bilaspur, on the other, " The point
five conditions set out in paragraph
21 of Consolidated Engg. Enterprises v. Principal secy.,
Irrigation Deptt., (2008) 7 SCC 169, which reads as follows ... point out that conditions 1 to 4 mentioned in
9
the Consolidated Engineering case have, in fact, been met by the
appellant. It is clear
order dated 15.2.2011,
thereby holding that since in the case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises
Vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department it was held that Section ... judgment of
the Apex Court in the case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs.
Principal Secretary Irrigation Department and others , the learned Single Judge
ought
order dated 15.2.2011,
thereby holding that since in the case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises
Vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department it was held that Section ... judgment of
the Apex Court in the case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs.
Principal Secretary Irrigation Department and others , the learned Single Judge
ought
Narain Yadav vs. Lalit
Narayan Mishra1 , Fairgrowth Investments Ltd. vs. Custodian2 ,
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation
Department and others3, Commissioner of Customs
Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd. And another [2004( 11) SCC 456], Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others [2008 ( 7) SCC 169], Commissioner ... Court, it does not square also with the subsequent judgment in Consolidated Engg. Enterprises v. Principal secy., Irrigation Deptt
